50% Returns
Click here to go to the original topic

 
       Value Investing Forum Forum Index -> Value Investing
teenvestor2 Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:03 am    

50% Returns 
I’m sure we’ve all heard the Warren Buffet quote that if he had less than $1,000,000 he could, no would, make 50% on his money annually. Well, can it be done?


Don’t Trust all the Adds

Every other investing website advertises how they use Warren Buffet’s techniques to pick winning stocks, whether it’s screens, or only buying obscure stocks about 99% of them are bad, as highlighted in this article by Bill Mann. If all of these sites can make all of this money off of Warren Buffet’s techniques why do they need to sell them on a website?


The Theory Behind the Quote

Small investors have tremendous advantages over bigger investors and institutions. It’s your money there are no limits to how many companies you own, what industry they're in, if they have unionized workers, if they're a “sin stock”, or if their market cap is below $100 million.

By combing the pink-sheets or a local stock exchange you can find tons of companies undervalued, simply because they're so small Wall St. doesn’t care enough about them to fully value them. Some of these small companies are truly gems, it’s not that hard to find one that goes up 1000% percent, but it’s easier to find one that will go bankrupt so don’t think I’m tooting penny stocks.

Warren Buffet says if he had less than a million dollars, he would take advantage of that and wouldn’t have to buy the whole company when he found an un-recognized one. Of course Warren Buffet can do it, but it’s a lot harder for every other mortal on the earth to do it.

Just to make sure you not going to go to the stock exchange fifty miles from your house tomorrow that trades companies with market caps less than one million lets clarify that getting 50% returns over a period longer than two months is near impossible. I’m sure some people can achieve those returns over two, maybe three, years, but after those two or three years their returns will suffer and their five-year average will probably be under 30%.

If you think you’re going to get these returns the first thing you have to do is go on Amazon and buy all of the value and financials statement analysis books and read them. After you do that comb the pink-sheets and local stock exchanges for companies with high returns on capital or low price/book or other metrics, it doesn’t really matter what you screen for it’ll probably be undervalued, than use your expertise to find only the best companies that are trading for less than 50% of their fair value and buy them. Even if you do all of this and become an expert, because of the size of the companies you’re working with, chances are probably good that your returns could go down 50% and not up 50%.



OK, I’m not going to get 50% returns, what’s reasonable and how do I get it?


It’s very possible for you to get 15% returns over five years and 12-15% over the long run, but even these take a lot of work. You may still want to buy all those books from Amazon. To do this you’ll have to diversify a little. By this I don’t mean go crazy own 217 companies from every size, industry and country, I mean don’t put all of your money into these micro-caps, that’s suicide. Put at least thirty percent into companies with extra-wide moats and multi billion dollar market caps – like Wal Mart and Bud – only buy these when they have suffered short falls and are temporarily undervalued. Current examples of this are:

· Pfizer (PFE)
· Wal Mart (WMT)
· Boston Scientific (BSX)
· Anheuser Busch (BUD)
· Microsoft, etc.

Put some into mid-cap companies with market caps between 1-10 billion, and finish it off with everything under one billion. Every now and then put some money into an arbitrage situation.



So if Buffet says these returns are easy why didn’t he get them?


He may have, nobody really knows what returns he had before the partnership, but while he had the partnership he got returns of 29% a year. You could say it was because he managed over a million dollars, but I think it’s for a different reason.

The first two companies he invested in for reason other than its trading below Net Net Working Capital were American Express – big salad oil scandal for a different time – and Disney – because he loved the brand – in other words he stopped with the blinders and looked into the intangibles and found value in brand names and competitive advantages. There are a lot of reason for this, but I bet Charlie Munger and Phillip Fisher are the two biggest ones.

If this is correct it means you need to look past how much cash per share a company has, or if its P/E is less than 5, it means that he’d rather “ buy a good company at a fair price than a fair company at a good price.” I’m betting that if he believed in this when he was only managing a few million, he would have gotten 50% returns, but by the time he figured it out he decided to stay out of the market because of its over valuation and he had too much money.



Conclusion


OK now you know not to believe ads that tell you they’ll teach you how to get 50% - or higher, maybe lower – returns, because it’s impossible. Now all you have to do is keep learning and next thing you know people will crowd around you at cocktail parties and ask you for your next big stock tip.
blast_investor Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:14 pm    

 
When did Warren Buffet quote that 50% return? In what context?
teenvestor2 Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:26 pm    

 
I don't remember when but he said if he had less than $1,000,000 to invest he was certain he could earn 50% a year, check out Trade Like Warren Buffett, Altucher quotes Buffett a lot in the book and the time and place for that quote is mentioned.

-Mike
xxyygorich Mon Feb 13, 2006 3:54 pm    

 
I think the number of annual return is a trick number.

If u acheive a 10% return in 3 month, it is so called 50% annual return.

I don't know about WB, but a lot of annual return is based on this kind of trick.
blast_investor Mon Feb 13, 2006 4:09 pm    

 
That of course does not count.

This 50% return means average annualized return on a portfolio.



xxyygorich wrote: I think the number of annual return is a trick number.

If u acheive a 10% return in 3 month, it is so called 50% annual return.

I don't know about WB, but a lot of annual return is based on this kind of trick.
teenvestor Mon Feb 13, 2006 5:49 pm    

 
He meant he'd be able to get the 50% return by engaging on cigar butts and other Ben Graham plays, as well as buying quality micro caps. Not just 10% in 3 months

-Mike
zhao_xing Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:29 pm    

 
Here is the talk he mentioned 50% return.

http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2005/050713.htm
teenvestor2 Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:20 pm    

 
That link doesn't work...
zhao_xing Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:24 pm    

 
Sorry.


http://www.fool.com/community/pod/2005/050713.htm
blast_investor Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:17 pm    

 
WOW,

"follow Graham and you'll be fine."
 
       Value Investing Forum Forum Index -> Value Investing
Page 1 of 1

Search Engine Indexer
BlastInvest @2005 p h p B B © 2001, 2002 p h p B B Group